Throughout history, poor maintenance, unofficial parts, and corner-cutting have contributed to numerous aviation disasters. These errors not only led to the loss of life but also prompted significant safety changes in the industry. In this blog, we will explore three critical incidents that highlight the catastrophic consequences of maintenance failures and the lasting impact they had on aviation safety.
Click here for a link to the podcast
The 1949 Strato-Freight Curtiss C-46A Crash: A Fatal Combination of Overloading and Faulty Parts
Our first story takes us back to June 7, 1949, when a Strato-Freight Curtiss C-46A crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, ten kilometers west of San Juan-Isla Grande Airport in Puerto Rico. This disaster, which claimed the lives of 53 of the 81 people on board, was a tragic example of how poor maintenance and operational decisions can lead to catastrophe.
Three days before the accident, the Curtiss C-46A had undergone regular maintenance in San Juan. Mechanics installed a new flap follow cable and replaced several spark plugs in the right engine, which had been misfiring. Unfortunately, the replacement spark plugs—thirteen of them—were non-approved AC-LS-87 plugs, which were not certified by Pratt and Whitney, the engine manufacturer. These plugs were entirely unsuitable for the engine’s high combustion chamber temperatures, and their use would prove to be a fatal mistake.
On June 7, the aircraft, piloted by Captain Lee Howard Wakefield and crew, took off from San Juan en route to Miami. The plane was significantly overloaded, carrying 75 passengers (including infants and children) and over 3,000 pounds more than its maximum allowable weight. As the plane climbed to its cruising altitude, the right engine failed. Instead of feathering the propeller and reducing drag, the crew tried to restart the engine – which is what most aviators would do to be fair to the crew. However the extra drag and mass meant the plane would not maintain altitude and the crew ultimately losing control of the aircraft. Moments later, the plane plunged into the ocean.
Miraculously, the aircraft remained afloat for six minutes, allowing 25 passengers and all five crew members to evacuate. Tragically, 53 passengers were trapped inside the cabin and perished. The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) investigation revealed that the non-certified spark plugs had caused the engine failure, and the crew’s failure to properly manage the emergency situation had compounded the disaster.
The final report, released exactly one year after the accident, led to Strato-Freight’s operating certificate being revoked, and Captain Wakefield’s license was suspended for six months due to his violations of aviation safety regulations. This incident served as a grim reminder of the importance of adhering to proper maintenance procedures and ensuring that all aircraft components meet certification standards.
The Azores Glider: When Fuel Leaks and Crew Errors Nearly Led to Disaster
Our second story brings us to August 24, 2001, when Air Transat Flight 236, an Airbus A330 flying from Toronto to Lisbon, experienced a total loss of engine power over the Atlantic Ocean. Known as the “Azores Glider,” this incident became famous for the aircraft’s record-breaking glide of nearly 75 miles without engines. While all 306 passengers and crew survived, the situation could have easily turned catastrophic due to improper maintenance and crew errors.
The flight, commanded by Captain Robert Piché and First Officer Dirk DeJager, initially seemed routine. However, four hours into the flight, the aircraft began to leak fuel due to a fracture in a fuel line to the no. 2 engine. The crew did not realize the severity of the situation until it was almost too late. Instead of following the proper procedures outlined in the checklist, they relied on memory and began cross-feeding fuel into the leaking engine, exacerbating the problem.
By the time the crew declared a fuel emergency and diverted to Lajes Air Base in the Azores, both engines had flamed out, leaving the Airbus A330 as a glider. The plane lost primary electrical power, and the emergency ram air turbine deployed to provide essential power for flight instruments and hydraulic systems. The situation was dire, but the crew’s skill and composure during the emergency enabled them to execute a successful landing at Lajes.
The subsequent investigation revealed that the fuel leak was caused by an improper part fitted to the hydraulics system during maintenance. Air Transat had installed a part from an older model engine, leading to chafing between the hydraulic and fuel lines, which eventually caused the rupture. The Canadian government fined Air Transat C$250,000 for the maintenance errors, and the investigation led to significant changes in fuel-leak procedures for Airbus aircraft.
Despite the crew’s initial mistakes, Captain Piché and his team were hailed as heroes upon their return to Canada. The Airline Pilots Association even awarded Captain Piché the Superior Airmanship Award in 2002. The incident also led to important safety improvements, including new procedures for handling fuel leaks and modifications to Airbus’ on-board computer systems.
British Airways Flight 5390: A Captain Sucked Out of the Cockpit Due to Faulty Windshield Installation
Our final story takes us to June 10, 1990, when British Airways Flight 5390 experienced a terrifying incident mid-flight. The left windscreen of the BAC One-Eleven aircraft blew out, causing Captain Timothy Lancaster to be partially sucked out of the cockpit. Incredibly, thanks to the quick actions of the crew, Captain Lancaster survived, and the aircraft landed safely. However, this near-disaster was caused by a simple yet critical maintenance error—incorrectly installed bolts.
Captain Lancaster, an experienced pilot with over 11,000 flight hours, was at the controls when the windscreen suddenly blew out at 17,300 feet. The decompression forcefully ejected him from his seat, leaving him hanging halfway out of the aircraft, his legs caught on the flight controls. First Officer Alastair Atchison took control of the plane, while flight attendants Nigel Ogden and Simon Rogers held onto the captain, preventing him from being fully sucked out of the aircraft.
Despite the chaos in the cockpit and the rapid descent of the aircraft, First Officer Atchison managed to stabilize the plane and communicate with air traffic control. The aircraft made an emergency landing at Southampton Airport, and miraculously, Captain Lancaster survived, suffering only frostbite and minor injuries.
The investigation revealed that the windscreen had been installed just 27 hours before the flight, but the bolts used were 0.66 mm too small in diameter. The maintenance engineer who fitted the windscreen had not followed proper procedures, and no second check was conducted to ensure the installation was correct. This incident highlighted serious flaws in the maintenance and quality assurance processes at British Airways, leading to significant changes in the airline’s maintenance policies.
Captain Lancaster returned to work after less than five months, and First Officer Atchison and the cabin crew were awarded the Queen’s Commendation for Valuable Service in the Air. The incident prompted widespread changes in maintenance practices and underscored the importance of rigorous checks for critical components.
Conclusion: Lessons Learned from Tragic Mistakes
These three incidents—each caused by maintenance failures—serve as stark reminders of the critical importance of adhering to proper procedures in aviation. Whether it’s using certified parts, following checklists, or ensuring that maintenance work is double-checked, the smallest oversight can lead to disastrous consequences.
In each case, lives were saved by the skill and bravery of the flight crews, but these incidents also prompted significant changes in safety regulations and maintenance protocols that continue to protect passengers today. As we continue exploring aviation disasters in future episodes, it’s clear that learning from past mistakes is essential to improving safety in the skies.
Stay tuned for our next episode, where we’ll investigate the Aeroflot Nord 821 accident, a chilling tale of substance abuse and a tragic crash in Russia.
This deep dive into aviation disasters caused by maintenance failures highlights the intricate connections between human error, mechanical failure, and the crucial role of adherence to regulations. By revisiting these incidents, we honour the lives lost and the lessons learned, ensuring that the skies remain as safe as possible for all who travel them.
Leave a Reply